Modern Monetary Theory (mmt) group
Group profile
- Avatar
-
- Nickname
- mmt
- Full name
- Modern Monetary Theory
- Note
- Looking at the macroeconomic implications of fiat money. AKA chartalism, money mechanics or dynamics.
- Aliases
- chartalism mmd mmm
Group actions
Notices
-
By the way, the previous comment could be of interest to MMTers !mmt
-
!mmt "MMT as an ECB Alternative: 2,181 Italians pack a Sports Arena to learn Modern Monetary Theory" http://michael-hudson.com/2012/02/mmt-theory-as-an-ecb-alternative/
-
@sean and MMTers in general: follow up to the WaPo article. Matías Vernengo has his own comments and links to Dean Baker and Jared Bernstein: http://nakedkeynesianism.blogspot.com.au/2012/02/mmt-and-its-discontents.html !mmt
-
@sean you were very quiet on the recent !mmt JG debates - care to add any thoughts? You can see a link to practically all recent criticisms and responses here http://pear.ly/9RAb
-
Dear all. As @sean is interested in why !mmt is so misunderstood, this post might be of some interest: "On Folly, Master Chefs and Bonhoeffer" http://aussiemagpie.blogspot.com/2012/01/on-folly-master-chefs-and-bonhoeffer.html
-
A little "History of Modern Monetary Theory". I can't tell how accurate it is (that's up to !mmt gurus to judge) but interesting, nevertheless. http://socialdemocracy21stcentury.blogspot.com/2012/01/history-of-modern-monetary-theory.html
-
!mmt A question for MMTers from Angry Bear: What Happens if IOR (interest on reserves) Goes to Zero? http://www.angrybearblog.com/2012/01/question-for-market-monetarists-and.html
-
!mmt I thought hopefully some of the local MMT gurus could have a look at the article and then we could discuss if the error I think I found is real.
-
!mmt This article came to my attention: http://www.economics.harvard.edu/files/faculty/40_whatdobudgetdeficitsdo.pdf At one stage, the author concludes that S=Y-C-G. Using then Y=C+I+G+NX, he goes on to find S=I+NX. I believe he is wrong, but as I am not an expert CONT
-
Rearranging the equations using Algebra showing working I get (I-S)+(G-T)+(X-M)=(T-G)+(S-I)+(M-X) which is fair enough but using X-M as NX I get (T-G)+(S-I)-NX which is just confusing !mmt I get the big stuff but not the little stuff apparently
-
Budget Deficit (G-T) of 4.3%, Current Account Deficit of (X-M)2.6%, what's the private sector? I got a small surplus but I had to multiply by -1 and I recall that's a bad thing. Stuck on the small things. !mmt
-
@ramanan A nice complement to Wolf's piece. It contains some questionable ideas from an !mmt perspective. Otherwise, very good: Doom! http://www.tnr.com/article/economy/magazine/94963/economic-doom?passthru=ZTQ0NjYwNGNiYzc5MzhjYjUwN2ZlNTA0ZGNkNmIxNTQ
-
At times hard to follow, interesting nonetheless: What is Debt? – An Interview with Economic Anthropologist David Graeber http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/08/what-is-debt-%E2%80%93-an-interview-with-economic-anthropologist-david-graeber.html !mmt
-
!mmt this is a little thing i wrote up called "the negative supply and demand effects of capital gains (and rentier income) becoming a large and growing share of total income" http://goo.gl/L8Tkv the genesis was a response to a comment on mike norman's mmt blog.
-
!mmt folk should enjoy this one http://christopherjoye.blogspot.com/2011/08/us-uk-europe-and-japanese-central-banks.html have a laugh
- Pagination